Analysis of Paradigmatic Relations Existing Among Lexemes
Table of Contents
entering2
1. Paradigmatic relation among lexemes3
1.1 Homonymy3
1.2 Polysemy4
1.3 Synonymy4
1.4 Antonymy5
1.5 subordination/hyperonymy6
subtraction7
SOURCES OF LITERATURE:8
Introduction
In this seminar work IÂ will hit the books paradigmatic dealingships existing among lexemes and I will also subjoin some examples for better explanation.
1. Paradigmatic relation among lexemes
Paradigmatic lexical relations derive from the possibility to substitute on the lexical axis individual words serve as substitutes they ar in a substitutional relations.
(Kvetko, 2003, p. 57)
Lexical semantics deals predominantly with paradigmatic relations among lexemes. Basically, there be five types of paradigmatic relations:
1. Homonymy
2. Polysemy
3. Synonymy
4. Antonymy
5. Hyponymy/hyperonymy
(Å tekauer, 2005, p. 66)
1.1 Homonymy
The signifiant of the linguistic sign, i.e. the phonological or graphemic form, is identical, the signifié, the meaning, is different and unrelated. Thus, as hostile to polysemy, homonymy does not occur within a single lexeme; it is a relationship between different lexemes.
Depending on the kind of conventional identity we can distinguish:
a) Homoph is they are identical in the sound form of the lexemes.
Examples: sell cell, son sun, steal steel
b) Homographs they concord in the spelling
Examples: lead (verb) [li:d] lead (noun) [led]
c) Full homonyms they postulate identical sound form and spelling
Examples: delusion (lay, lain) lie (lied, lied), file (catalogue) file (tool),
(Å teakuer, 2005, p. 66)
1.2 Polysemy
The signifiant is identical, however, as opposed to homonymy, the signifiés are partly identical, semantically related. In other words, the sememes of different meanings of one lexeme must have at least some of semes in common. Hence, polysemy is the...If you want to get a full essay, install it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment