Marx on the Historical Change of Capitalism

Production, he says, is al modes a reference to production at a definite award of societal development, meaning production by social individuals (222-223). The rule of political economy, states Marx, is to c one timeive of economic categories in terms of their sexual congress to wholeness an separate in modern bourgeois society, sightedness them in a Hegelian tension rather than in the order in which they were historically decisive (243).

For Marx, the force that determines social relations is economic and is identified by the relationship of the gay being to labor. Marx has a sup postal serviceion of human history base on dialectical materialism, a perspective which includes the idea that the ascertain factors in the development, relations, and institutions of mankind are not mystical or ideological but economic. Human motivations are rooted in the labor activities of human beings. Human beings have to secure a livelihood, and to accomplish this they organize their productive forces in a way that is based on the level of development of society and indeed the type of economic system that has been produced. For Marx, everything in life rests on these economic foundations. Society is made up of social classes, with one class dominant at a given prison term based on the control of the means of production. Human constitution is expressed in the way individuals relate to class and the way they are controlled by that relationship. The workers sell their labor an

Marx finds that the demands of the proletariate once they had the ability to impose their will remained much or less unclear and confused, but what they sought, he says, was the abolishment of the class antagonism between capitalists and workers. This created a threat to the exist order and caused the bourgeoisie to seek to disarm the workers, leading to a new difference of opinion in which the workers lost (620). marx looks back to the age of the Paris intercommunicate and considers its nature and the elements that it brought forth on the political scene.

He finds that the workers had to eliminate all the machinery of power that existed before and accordingly had to install their own, but at the same time they had to caution themselves by providing the means by which they could remove their own deputies and officials at any moment. This is a democratic principle, that the leadership can be recalled when it is not carrying out the will of the people (627).

Marx sees the Paris Commune as a model that, had it prevailed, would have served as a model for other areas in France and ultimately for the entire concept of the dictatorship of the proletariate. A Communal Constitution was to emerge that would be the expression of the people, empowered by the people and not the other way around. The failure of the working class to h octogenarian their position was what changed this situation so that the bourgeoisie managed to gain ascendancy once more and to eliminate this incipient and true democracy, a native democracy that would have been the beginning of the different order Marx in the next century was again advocating.

According to Marx, all the presumable struggles within a state, the struggle between democracy, aristocracy, and monarchy, are only if the illusory forms of the true struggle between the different classes. He further finds that every class struggle is a struggle for mastery, and this is the case even when, as with the proletariate, what is necessary is the abolition of the old for
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.