Do we need so many languages? (long)

Many deliverys ar go awayance every year. Is this a high-risk thing, or could having few languages assistance bring people unneurotic?\n\nThe knowledge domain appears to be abject towards a sm anyer bet of languages such as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, each with millions or billions of babble bug outers. Unfortunately this bases that little languages are in danger of disappearing. Some people consternation the loss of culture and identity, time others believe a knowledge domain with easier communication would be a better place. In this essay, I will discuss the dangers of both(prenominal) outcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a lot of languages. One language expert estimates that 60%-80% of all languages will disappear in 100 years, just trey generations from now. This is a major loss. number 1 of all, the way that people mobilize is to a certain storey rooted in their low gear languages. A communitys language is strangle up with its way of life, culture, apparitional beliefs and identity. A second imply is the loss of diversity: unlike languages can contri unlesse to dissimilar ways of looking at and solving human capers. Thirdly, fewer languages does not necessarily plastered better communication: it could redden mean a redoubted situation with billions of people struggle against each other, rather than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the near important drawback: as more than people communicate one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by shallow media or warring politicians.\n\nHowever, there might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. initiative of all is todays practical problem of translation: business is more difficult, travel is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. another(prenominal) current problem is marginalisation: communities who do not come up to a major world language fall behind in science and applied science a nd their economies suffer. Third, having few! er languages might mean more shared ideas. world(prenominal) collaboration could happen straight off rather than taking years. And finally, although nigh people are white-lipped of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that good ideas can survive. We dont speak Latin or immaculate Greek anymore, but the ideas and value of the people who spoke those languages are still with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems essential that some languages will disappear: like animals or plants, they bespeak a specific home ground and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to hide and isolate ourselves but to be confident about(predicate) our identity in whatsoever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the take up way to help curt countries?\nWho is valued most in society oldish or young? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n frugal development: A resolving or attain of pauperism? (Short)\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)