The story is presented in a first person point of view, just the narrative stance is actually subjective because the narrator exhibits no self-pity in this critique of war. The rivalry is outside the story, because it is a satire. The opposition is the deterioration and contamination of the humanistic schools in Germany by the Nazi party, and their destruction of youth to further their own agenda. The story is locomote forward by the narrators attempts to figure out if hes in his old school, a genuine studies gymnasium, and how he was hurt. As he is moved around, he takes in his surroundings to see if any of it is familiar, and in this process he illustrates the opposition and message of the story.
Along the walls he sees a scene of the classic myth of Medea, a woman who kills her children, representing the loss of sinlessness in the narrator and a recreation of a Parthenon frieze with depictions of Greek warriors, Hohenzollern rulers and the presumptuous inclusion of Hitler. He passes the artistic renditions of the Nazis eugenic dreams, recalling faults in these racial paradigms like the Rhine maiden he considered a bit bony and severe. The nobility of the cause he gave his life for is called into question when he identifies the pre-fabricated war memorial suspension in the school, from the last war. This isnt an angry outcry on his part, but more of confusion, as he wonders how the school yearbook will...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment